News To Me

Canada: No Statute Limitations on Horrific Behavior

Most Americans do not pay close attention to legal matters in Canada, even if they involve sports figures. Fewer still follow the results of events that happened decades ago, even as they are thrust into the national spotlight. The Sandusky and Fine scandals, for instance, flashed upon our national consciousness briefly, but are no longer the top stories.

So it is little wonder that the case of Graham Jones has remained largely under the radar in the US. Graham Jones was a well-respected junior hockey coach in Canada, personally selecting young men to receive additional coaching and opportunities which ultimately could land them in the NHL. He was also a serial child molester who repeatedly targeted boys and then threatened those future hockey plans if they did not succumb to his pedophile behaviors.

Yesterday Graham Jones pleaded guilty to child molestation charges based on events that happened in the 1980's. It took a professional hockey star, Theo Fleury, to write a memoir long after Jones could do him any harm, to draw attention to the power that these coaches have over young, immature and impressionable minds.

Too many boys. Too often. Mostly unnoticed. How do we stop it?

Did JoePa turn a blind eye? Or is Sandusky lying?

Jerry Sandusky says that Joe Paterno never confronted him about allegations of abuse.  Never. Not in 1998 when a mother reported Sandusky for showering with her son. Not in 2002 when Assistant Coach McQuery went and spoke with Paterno about an attack that he stopped. 

Never.

In the same interview, Sandusky says that he never did anything wrong. Not one of the eight victims listed in the Grand Jury indictment. None. The assistant coach and the janitor did not see what they said they saw. Neither of them. And he, Sandusky, did not abuse any of the children.

Never.

So do you believe him? Or do you believe some things he said and not others? Is he a credible source of information?

 

10 Great Excuses for Missing Work

I have been heavy on the Penn State/Syracuse scandal lately so I thought I would lighten up a bit. From a Career Builder survey (posted here), here are 10 creative excuses for missing work:

• "Bats got in her hair."
• "Got a cold from a puppy."
• "Hurt his back chasing a beaver."
• "Had a headache after going to too many garage sales."
• "Brother-in-law was kidnapped by a drug cartel while in Mexico."
• "Ate too much at a party."
• "A refrigerator fell on him."
• "Got his toe caught in a vent cover."
• "Drank anti-freeze by mistake and had to go to the hospital."
• "Deer bit him during hunting season."

My best excuse?

I BROKE MY ARM WHILE CHASING A RUN-AWAY COW FOR FIVE HOURS!

The Recipe for Abuse?

What do the sexual abuse scandals at Penn State and Syracuse have in common? If we can analyze that, then perhaps we can concoct a recipe for potentially abusive situations in the future, and act before they get out of hand. With that in mind, here are six similarities between the two scandals:

1. A head coach who is perceived as "unassailable" by the university. The label "unassailable" in this context is used to denote not-fireable, above the law or rules of the school, more identified with the college than any other factor (including academics), etc.  
2. A long-time assistant coach who mostly flies under the radar. By being a "second fiddle," successful assistants enjoy all the trappings of a successful program without the limitations of notoriety or scrutiny. Realistically had anyone (outside of rabid fans) really heard of Jerry Sandusky or Bernie Fine before the scandals broke?
3. A means to gain access to victims outside of "normal" channels. For Sandusky, it was his Second Mile charity, which brought at-risk young boys into his circle. For Fine it was the coach/ballboy relationship with the team. 
4. A college campus and/or program that is unrealistically driven by a history and expectation of success. Penn State has two national championships in football; Syracuse has one in basketball, one national runner-up and numerous Sweet Sixteen appearances.
5. A place without the media coverage of the large markets (except for the sport in question). Though well-known in athletic circles, Happy Valley, PA, and Syracuse, NY, both qualify as "off the main path" places.
6. Evidence of a lack of concern over athletic misbehavior on the part of the head coach. Paterno was notorious for handling even the most serious allegations "in house." While prior to this scandal Boeheim was not implicated in serious wrong-doing, his program did receive sanctions for NCAA violations in 1992, and several of his players have had marijuana violations (most notably Carmelo Anthony).

So what programs fit this recipe? Here is a chart showing the longest tenured NCAA Football coaches (courtesy of Business Insider):

In basketball, there are 19 Division I coaches with tenures longer than 15 years (from Rivals.com). If we shorten the list to include only those school with rabid fans and long-standing winning traditions, the list looks like this (in order of tenure):

• Jim Boeheim, Syracuse (Paterno was #1 on the football list before his firing this year)
• Mike Krzyzewski, Duke
• Jim Calhoun, Connecticut
• Tom Izzo, Michigan State

If we similarly shorten the football list to those programs that regularly compete for the national championship, we get:

• Frank Beamer, Virginia Tech
• Mack Brown, Texas
• Bob Stoops, Oklahoma

I am in no way trying to suggest or implicate any of these seven programs in any kind of scandal in any way. Period. But...shouldn't we take a closer look at these seven to see if they match any of the other ingredients for a scandal?